Before you flame me, I said “better than most.” Obviously I wasn’t talking about your local coffeehouse. So get over it.
I just returned from a trip that took me through 12 states, across 3/4 of the country, and that put over six thousand miles on the Scarlet Stang I rented. Coffee may have been the most important fuel on my trip, and therefore I visited I-don’t-know-how-many coffeehouses. Some of them S$ locations, most of them not. I’m back to tell you that Starbucks beats almost all of them hands down, and for one reason: service.
I know it’s fashionable to rip on Starbucks: their coffee is bitter (because they roast it too long), their stores have become cluttered with merchandise, their espresso machines suck, their baristas aren’t quick/talkative/quiet/comely/cheerful/flexible/efficient… enough. There are countless other complaints I’m sure.
And don’t get me wrong. I’m a big supporter of local coffee shops. Big supporter! Just ask the staff and owners of those shops I frequent and write about in my freelance work.
Yet here’s the thing. I was on the road for 15 days during which time I visited on average two coffee shops a day. Three or four of them were Starbuckses, the rest were locally owned businesses. The one thing that Starbucks does undeniably well, and better than almost (there’s that word again) any local place I’ve visited on this or any trip, is train their employees to put the customer first. While on the road, only at Starbucks did a worker drop what they were doing to take care of me when I arrived at the counter. In one particularly irksome case, a barista was polishing silverware as I stood waiting. She finished the piece she was working on, and then polished two more before another person appeared from the back room and nodded in my direction. Maybe she didn’t see me though I was no more than 10 feet from her with nothing between us but the counter. Maybe I should have cleared my throat.
At Starbucks I have never, not once, had to wait for a barista to finish another task before getting served, unless that task was waiting on a customer who was there before me. At local coffee shops I have routinely been made to wait for no reason, been treated brusquely, had to ask three and four times for the same thing, and even been made fun of by the person behind the counter for mispronouncing an item on the menu.
Not that I’m complaining. Sometimes the coffee and/or the food I bought was terrific even when the service wasn’t. But service counts and as anyone in the restaurant business knows, it can count even more than the quality of the food. For some reason, many local coffee shops are slow to learn this. Maybe it’s why most of them don’t survive. A shame really, because some of these places do actually serve better coffee. But me no buts about the worker pool that local places have to choose from. Starbucks hires from the same demographic, and the exceptions I’ve listed below discount that argument. I think it’s a training issue.
If you wish to disparage my thesis, by all means go ahead! You may do so in the comments, but be warned: this is not a thread where we complain about Starbucks baristas or rehash any of the numerous reasons why some folks don’t like Big Green. Comments like that will be removed with extreme prejudice.
You can say you don’t like Starbucks, but do it quickly and then offer something pertinent to this discussion. This will help others to more readily agree with you that I’m full of it.
Finally, before I close, I’d like to point out a couple of establishments that were/are the exception that proves the rule (and all have free wifi). Sad to say that these are the only ones out of the many non-Starbux I visited that come readily to mind as examples of good service:
- The Homepage Cafe in Bozeman, MT. Above average coffee, excellent food, and great service from well trained and good humored people.
- Jackpine Java (formerly Black Moose Coffeehouse) in Park Rapids, MN. No fanfare, just efficient and good natured service. Excellent coffee and homemade goodies!
- Churchill in Pottstown, PA — my hometown coffeehouse and third place. Baristas Erica and Dana are the very personification of excellent customer service. The coffee is better than average and the food is second to none.
- Java’s Brewin’ in Limerick, PA — my fourth place because nothing can displace Churchill. If it were possible though, this place would do it. The coffee is very good and the entirely homemade menu is too. Tell owners Lisa and Bob that I sent you.







25 comments
Comments feed for this article
September 27, 2007 at 5:35 pm
beth
All things considered, if I go to a store for something I can very easily make myself at home, I’m not going because it’s better than I can make it, I’m going because I want the experience. And that includes good service. So I would say that generally I agree with you, though I wish to high heaven that I had a local coffee shop I could champion as one of the select that “gets it”, I don’t. If I want coffee without attitude, I go to *$. Even though they keep raising their stinking prices.
There is one good local shop up by where I used to work that seemed to put a focus on quality service. However, the manager there was hired away from, you guessed it, the *$ down the block. So, I’m guessing that he took some of the tenets with.
September 27, 2007 at 5:45 pm
Rick
Good post here. I would add that most of us have one or two places we like to frequent other than Starbucks, but we always turn to the familiar green sign in a pinch. It’s available, it’s familiar, and it’s reliable.
September 27, 2007 at 5:59 pm
joellyn77
Believe it or not I have never tasted Starbucks coffee so I cannot cast my vote for or against. The best coffee I have sampled is from the Shady Maple Smorg in Lancaster County. Good Pa Dutch home cooking. I love their breakfast buffet.
September 27, 2007 at 6:28 pm
jvjannotti
Shady Maple has many devoted fans, though it doesn’t really fall into the coffeehouse category.
Thanks for commenting!
September 27, 2007 at 6:34 pm
jvjannotti
Beth and Rick,
Thanks for your insight. I might point out that McDonalds is also available, familiar, and reliable. They now have passable coffee too (no pun intended there, btw) yet even at McD’s I’ve had some pretty lackluster service experiences. One of those was memorable enough to get its own post. So Starbucks trumps McD’s too, IMO.
There is a matter of wages too, Beth, which probably factored into the ex-manager’s decision to move. That raises another dynamic that in the real world, must be considered. Especially since so many local coffeehouses are “down the block” from a *$.
September 27, 2007 at 6:54 pm
gwynne
Unfortunately (for the local coffeehouses that do get it…and Kansas City has a great one just a block away from *$), *$ does consistently do service and ambience right (now, if they’d just offer free wifi!). In Seattle, there are several larger but still local chains that give *$ a run for the money in the service/ambience and coffee arena. But, service and coffee being equal, I will always choose the local shop.
September 27, 2007 at 7:03 pm
jvjannotti
Attention commenters: if you have a favorite customer friendly local coffeehouse, feel free to provide a link to it in your comments, or let me know what its name is and I’ll put a link in the post.
Gwynne: I’m with you on. Local is better, service being equal. I don’t even care if the coffee is equal.
Starbucks is, I believe, dumb for not offering their wifi for free. Given their otherwise customer friendly approach to business, I can’t figure that one out. T-mobile must be paying them a goziliion dollar promotional fee (but even so, they have the market power to tell T-mobile to pound sand).
September 27, 2007 at 7:20 pm
Brian
I’m a Caribou Coffee guy. I like that they don’t correct me when I say, “large,” the service there is at least as good as you describe Starbucks, and their coffee tastes *much* better to me.
I was just in there today and both baristas looked up at me when I came in and smiled, though they were plenty busy. With a glance at each other, they silently decided which would come see what I wanted and got me just that quick and friendly. Smiles and kind words were exchanged and I left happier than I arrived, as usual.
You want good local coffee, though, go to Scottie MacBean’s in Worthington, Ohio.
September 27, 2007 at 7:25 pm
Brian
Free WiFi at Caribou, too! But they’re not nationwide yet.
September 27, 2007 at 7:30 pm
jvjannotti
Coffee sure is a matter of taste, huh? I’ve never cottoned to Caribou. It’s good coffee but it’s always had this bitter edge to me. I know a lot of people say that about *$. Caribou stores do tend to have a better atmosphere than most starbucks, though. I’ll grant you that.
And I hesitate to mention this, but while the coffee at Scottie MacB’s was very good, the service was terrible (not the first time I’ve felt that way at that place, either) and their wifi didn’t work. I left there pretty frustrated the other day.
The farmer’s market was fun though.
September 27, 2007 at 11:30 pm
Julie
I hate coffee, but I do love Hot Chocolate.
And I prefer Starbucks over any I’ve tasted. Caribou is too milky. Not enough edge. Yesiree. Starbucks. Dark. Chocolatey. Mmmm.
“I’d like a tall non-fat peppermint hot chocolate.”
At Caribou, it’s not peppermint. It’s only mint. There is a huge difference. I’m a mint and chocolate snob.
I wish I could write this comment as well as Jim wrote the Starbucks Master’s Thesis above, but I’m afraid the best I can do is leave you with a kind of local coffee joint: The Liquid Bean. Granted, they have a very unattractive MS Frontpage-looking web site, and I can’t say their hot chocolate even comes close to Caribou, but they are they.
September 28, 2007 at 12:47 am
Gwynne
Here’s the link to LatteLand, an outstanding local shop. I was in Caribou Coffee (drive thru) for the first time the other day and while the service was great, I wasn’t partial to the latte I ordered…it was too milky also.
September 28, 2007 at 6:47 am
jvjannotti
Aww, man. I’m feeling sorry for Brian. Everybody’s harshin’ Caribou. They’re not so bad.
And while Julie’s local coffee shop (and wifi hotspot) didn’t make my short list of gold star service shops, I did like their coffee, the chocolate chip cookie, and the internet access.
September 28, 2007 at 7:45 am
beth
Ok, here’s a link to the coffee shop that I was referring to – though it’s changed hands since I was there (it used to be Common Grounds – get it? Too fun. And they played Christian alternative music. And life was good. And their coffee was delicious.) Tim still works up in that area and they tromp down to Murky for coffee fairly frequently and says taste and service-wise it’s even better. But I can no longer vouch for the ex *$ manager thing being true. Cause, well, I worked up there a long time ago.
All that said, Tim still loves Murky Coffee, and that’s good enough a recommendation for me (as he’s even pickier about service than I am.)
September 28, 2007 at 8:46 am
DarkoV
If I offend anyone, I’m launching preemptive apologies here. Though I always to prefer to support the local coffee shop before hitting a Starbucks or the Seattle Coffees in Borders, sometimes a freshly brewed cup of beans at home is best if any of the following are in place at a coffe establishment.
1) Sir/Madam, you are a barista, a position that, I’ll admit, does require some training and experience. But, you are not a nuclear engineer, medical doctor, plumber, carpenter, or CPA. Unless you speak Italian such that the melodious vowels emanating from your lips puts me into a foreign, Get Over Yourself.
2) Sir/Madam, while I strongly believe in the power and independence of the individual, especially when expressing one’s inner artistic (whether self-delusional or not) self, what I don’t want to see when I’m about to order a coffee or coffee accessory is nose and/or lip rings. I have no problem with rings on fingers, toes, or ears. However, when rings are on parts of the body which irritate said parts of the body such that fluids are flowing or such that speech is slurred (which is doubly irritating when combined with your natural tendency to mumble), I think I’ll be ordering something, anything, that is bottled with a cap sealed tightly by the Son of Odin.
3) Sir/Madam, I will gladly overpay for a cup of hot colored water if your establishment has clean floors, wiped tables, and clean coffee mugs/cups. You’ll get extra points from me if you use mugs/cups from that crafts/pottery store down the block. Shows me you put your money where your mouth is about supporting local trade. If you’re shilling your own muggery, deduct some points for squeezing in on that store’s territory. It can be pitch dark or new-dawn light; just don’t irritate me with blinking fluorescent lighting, the bane of a person’s mental health.
4) Lastly, Sir/Madam, we are in the new century. In fact, we’ve been here for 7 years. The century of cutesy names for establishments was the last one. And spelling? I like correct spelling as it has the tendency to eliminate cutesieness.
5) Sorry, one more thing. Stuffed animals. Coffee shops should never have stuffed animals. Coffee is (still) a socially accepted adult beverage; keep the stuffed animals in your van/SVU/station wagon. Thank You.
And yes, the ideal name for the caffeine venue I’d love to go to would be The Curmudgeonly Cup.
Now, stop yapping and get me that cup of Joe.
September 28, 2007 at 8:51 am
jvjannotti
I like the name, D. If you should start such a venture, I’d like to be your partner.
September 28, 2007 at 10:07 am
DarkoV
Jim,
I was so overwhelmed by my own blather in that comment that, upon re-reading it, I am truly appalled with the mis-spellings and missing words. My apologies.
Let me also correct the possible name of that clammy dishrag of a place that you are more than welcome to partner up with me, as you would certainly be the welcoming host at the establishment thus negating my…uhhmmm..negativity. Negating a negativity still results in a positive these days, right?
Anyway, the name should really be The Curmudgeonry Cup, as that word structure emphasizes the attitude more than the coffee. You can get a cup of coffee anywhere these days. But a well-tempered curmudgeonry? Hmm, that takes a lot of time and bitter honing. And we’d want our attitudes to be bitter, not our coffee.
September 28, 2007 at 10:56 am
jvjannotti
Sort of like those places that mistreat their customers as part of the gimmick? I decided long ago that I could never go into one of those places.
Unless I was working there. Then it would be easy.
(By the way DV, I edited the name attached to your last comment, I’m not sure if you wanted to run it with the ID you gave or not).
September 28, 2007 at 11:29 am
DarkoV
Jim,
Appreciate your discretion. I noticed when I posted that my identity was out there like the clothes-less Emperor.
September 28, 2007 at 1:04 pm
gwynne
Heh, the Clothes-less Curmudgeon. Do let me know when you guys open up your establishment. I’ll be sure to run the other way.
September 28, 2007 at 2:27 pm
jvjannotti
Gwynne,
That name doesn’t sound like it belongs on a coffeehouse. Another type of ‘house’ maybe.
September 29, 2007 at 3:02 pm
Stephen
I think that you just opened up a can of worms…well, gummi worms. It would appear that posts for or against Starbucks seem to elicit a good deal of response.
September 29, 2007 at 3:15 pm
jvjannotti
It appears that you are right. This post wasn’t comment bait though. It was inspired by a conversation I had with a coffee shop owner. I suggested the training hypothesis, she thought I had a point, and a post was born.
October 1, 2007 at 5:42 pm
Stephen
Ah, yes. Well, it was still a good idea, even an accidental one.
August 31, 2008 at 12:55 am
How to Spot a Bad Coffee Shop « Grounds for Burnt Offerings
[...] couple of sites here that also talks about bad coffee shop experience… and then you get those who like Starbucks too… There you have it. If you keep a watch for the above six factors, you will be on your [...]